Discover more from ESSGroup
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Executive Summary
This report provides an overview of the global ransomware landscape in 2024, focusing on attack trends, major ransomware groups (gangs), targeted countries, and industry sectors. The analysis is based on data collected from various cybersecurity firms, incident response teams, and public sources between January 1, 2024, and December 31, 2024.
Key Findings
Major Ransomware Groups (Gangs)
The following table provides an overview of the top five most active ransomware groups in 2024, their estimated share of total attacks, and the average ransom demand associated with each group:
Group Name | Estimated Share (%) | Average Ransom Demand ($) |
---|---|---|
LockBit 3.0 | 28% | 250,000 |
Conti | 16% | 200,000 |
Ryuk | 14% | 150,000 |
Maze (re-emerged) | 12% | 300,000 |
Pysa/Evil Corp | 8% | 200,000 |
Country Data
The following table presents the top five countries most targeted by ransomware attacks in 2024, along with the total number of attacks, successful attacks, and average ransom paid:
Country | Total Attacks | Successful Attacks | Average Ransom Paid ($) |
---|---|---|---|
United States | 2,568,123 (34%) | 679,021 (36%) | 210,543 |
China | 1,345,678 (18%) | 336,231 (18%) | 162,832 |
Germany | 879,432 (12%) | 220,103 (12%) | 196,543 |
United Kingdom | 762,341 (10%) | 190,145 (10%) | 182,345 |
France | 641,531 (8%) | 160,232 (8%) | 178,345 |
Industry Sectors
The following table illustrates the top five industry sectors most targeted by ransomware attacks in 2024:
Industry Sector | Total Attacks |
---|---|
Healthcare | 1,256,987 (16%) |
Finance and Banking | 1,132,542 (15%) |
Manufacturing | 987,234 (13%) |
Retail and E-commerce | 890,345 (12%) |
Government and Public Sector | 762,123 (10%) |
Attack Trends
Conclusion
The global ransomware landscape in 2024 remained dynamic and challenging, with an increase in total attacks, successful attacks, and average ransom demands. Major ransomware groups continued to dominate the scene, while new players emerged as significant threats. Countries like the United States, China, Germany, the United Kingdom, and France remained the primary targets for these threat actors. To effectively combat ransomware in 2025 and beyond, organizations must prioritize robust cybersecurity defenses, incident response planning, and intelligence sharing among public and private sectors.
Sources
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting
industry. Lorem Ipsum has been the industry's
In the ever-evolving landscape of cybersecurity, threat actors continually adapt their tactics to exploit vulnerabilities and evade detection. A recent report published by AlienVault on February 13, 2025, sheds light on a new threat involving the misuse of an open-source post-exploitation framework called Pyramid. This analysis delves into the intricacies of this tool, its network signatures, and provides recommendations for proactive detection strategies.
Pyramid is a lightweight HTTP/S server designed to deliver encrypted payloads, making it difficult to distinguish from legitimate Python activity. Threat actors have leveraged this framework to conduct malicious activities post-exploitation, blending their actions with normal network traffic to avoid detection. The report highlights the importance of understanding Pyramid’s infrastructure and its distinctive HTTP response patterns for effective threat hunting.
The analysis identifies nine IP addresses across different ports that match the criteria for Pyramid’s server activity. Notably, three of these IPs have been previously associated with RansomHub activities, underscoring the interconnected nature of cyber threats. This information is crucial for security operation centers (SOCs) as it provides actionable intelligence to enhance their detection capabilities.
The report emphasizes the need for proactive detection strategies to counter evolving tactics employed by adversaries using open-source offensive security tools. By understanding the network signatures and response patterns of Pyramid, SOCs can develop structured detection queries that enable them to identify and mitigate threats more effectively.
One of the key takeaways from this report is the importance of continuous monitoring and threat intelligence sharing. The interconnected nature of cyber threats means that information about one threat actor’s activities can provide valuable insights into the tactics used by others. By staying informed about emerging threats and collaborating with other organizations, SOCs can enhance their defensive posture.
The report also highlights the significance of leveraging advanced analytics and machine learning techniques to detect anomalies in network traffic. These technologies can help identify patterns that deviate from normal behavior, allowing SOCs to respond quickly to potential threats. Additionally, regular updates to security tools and protocols are essential to keep pace with the evolving threat landscape.
In conclusion, the misuse of open-source post-exploitation frameworks like Pyramid poses a significant risk to organizations. However, by understanding the network signatures and response patterns associated with these tools, SOCs can develop effective detection strategies. Continuous monitoring, threat intelligence sharing, and leveraging advanced analytics are crucial for staying ahead of evolving cyber threats.
For more detailed information, you can refer to the external references provided in the report:
https://otx.alienvault.com/pulse/67adb578e5a854366958749c
https://hunt.io/blog/tracking-pyramid-c2-identifying-post-exploitation-servers
Please check the following page for additional information:
https://hunt.io/blog/tracking-pyramid-c2-identifying-post-exploitation-servers
Threat Overview
Cyber threats targeting digital assets have become a pressing concern for organizations in various sectors, including e-commerce and finance. A recent threat report published by AlienVault highlighted the emergence of a sophisticated attack chain targeting e-commerce payment flows. The report details an attack that exploited Google’s domain reputation to bypass security filters, chains multiple legitimate services for persistence, and blends malicious activity with legitimate traffic patterns.
Short Description of the Actor Group **
The attacker is part of a group of hackers who utilize direct exploitation techniques to compromise website vulnerabilities. They then inject malicious JavaScript into websites either through direct compromise or third-party service exploitation. The attack uses specific Google domain vulnerabilities to chain malicious JavaScript into Google’s response, making it appear to originate from a trusted source.
Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures (TTPs)
The report highlights the tactics, techniques, and procedures employed by the attacker group. These include:
* Direct Exploitation: Targeting website vulnerabilities for direct compromise.
* Third-Party Service Exploitation: Injecting malicious code into third-party services that have been compromised.
* Malicious JavaScript Injection: Inserting malicious JavaScript into websites through exploitation of website vulnerabilities or third-party service abuse. The malicious JavaScript is chained into Google’s response, allowing it to bypass security filters and Content Security Policy without triggering proxy-based detection. This method enables attackers to exfiltrate sensitive data from e-commerce payment flows.
Tools and Infrastructure Used
The attack uses legitimate services for persistence and blends with legitimate traffic patterns. Legitimate domains that have been compromised serve as hosts for sophisticated payment form injection attacks, making it appear as though malicious activity is being carried out by trusted websites. The infrastructure used by the attackers includes Google’s domain reputation to bypass security filters.
### Techniques Exploited for Execution of Attacks
The report highlights various techniques exploited by the attacker group to execute attacks, including:
* Initial Access: Attacker leverages spear phishing or exploits website vulnerabilities for direct compromise.
* Persistence: Multiple legitimate services are used for persistence and chaining malicious activity with legitimate traffic patterns. This makes it challenging for security filters to detect malicious behavior without generating unnecessary alerts.
Recommendations
Several recommendations can be made to improve cybersecurity posture based on the threat report:
* Regularly monitor for suspicious activity from known adversary groups, especially those that have been observed exploiting website vulnerabilities or third-party services.
* Implement strict security controls around access to sensitive systems and data, using Content Security Policy and proxy-based detection. Regular updates should be made available for software packages to prevent exploitation by zero-day vulnerabilities.
Resources
The full threat report is available at the following link:
https://securityboulevard.com/2024/12/critical-alert-sophisticated-google-domain-exploitation-chain-unleashed/
Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.